Site Map | Latest Update
Home | Design | Materials | Case Studies | Data Base | Research | Services & Products | Useful Links
Register | Events   

 You are here: Home > Design > Performance > Thermal Analyses > DesignFormulae > unprotectedSlabs.htm

FAQ
Events
Thermal Analysis
  Introduction
  Heat Transfer
    Across Boundary
    Within Members
    Computer Packages
  Test Data
    Background
    Steel & Composite
    Concrete
  Design Formulae  
    Unprotected Steel
    Protected Steel
    Unprotected Composite Slab
    Concrete Members
  References

Design Formulae - Unprotected Composite Slabs

PrEN1994-1-2 provides the simple calculation models for determining the sagging and hogging moment resistances of unprotected composite slabs with profiled steel decking exposed to the standard fire. The evaluation of the temperature profiles in the slabs is given in its Annex D (informative).

Basically, the approach allows the temperatures of steel sheet, reinforcement bars in the ribs and the concrete slab to be separately calculated. The temperatures of the lower flange, web and upper flange of the steel decking, and the reinforcement bars in the ribs can be obtained by using the empirical formulae. However, the calculation of temperature profiles for the concrete part of the slabs is rather complicated as the temperature distribution across a concrete cross-section exposed to fire conditions will not be uniform. It will be too complicated to establish the isotherms within the concrete by using empirical formulae.

Currently, prEN1994-1-2 only provides a simple model for establishing the isotherm for a certain limiting temperature within the concrete, with temperatures beyond the limiting temperature being neglected and the remaining cross section being taken as under room temperature conditions. It must be emphasised that the limiting temperature is derived from equilibrium over the cross section and has no relation with temperature penetration (Both 1998). Such simplification may be adequate for the calculation of hogging moment resistance, but not for the thermal response analysis of the slabs. Alternatively, prEN1994-1-2 provides a conservative approximation by treating the composite slabs as solid slabs with the temperature distribution given in a table.

One assumption of the method is that the steel deck remains bonded to the concrete.

Steel Decking

The temperatures Θa of the lower flange, web and upper flange of the steel decking are given by:

(1)
with
where
Φ is the view factor of the upper flange [-];
b0…b4 is the coefficients for determining the temperatures of various parts of the steel decking as given in Table 1;
A/Lr is the rib geometry factor [mm];
A is the concrete volume of the rib per m rib length [mm3/m];
h2 is the depth of the rib [mm];
Lr is the exposed area of the rib per m rib length [mm3/m];
l1,l2 is the distances as shown in Figure 1 [mm];
l3 is the width of the upper flange [mm].

The definition of the geometric dimensions and factors of a typical composite slab is given in Figure 1.


Figure 1 Definition of geometric dimensions of composite slabs (EN1994-1-2: 2003)

Reinforcement Bars

The temperature Θs of the reinforcement bars in the rib (see Figure 2) is given by:

(2)
with
where
α is the angle of the web [degree];
c0…c5 is the coefficients for determining the temperature of rebars in the rib as given in Table 2;
A/Lr is the rib geometry factor [mm];
A is the concrete volume of the rib per m rib length [mm3/m];
h2 is the depth of the rib [mm];
Lr is the exposed area of the rib per m rib length [mm2/m];
l3 is the width of the upper flange [mm];
u1, u2 is the shortest distance from the rebar centre to any point of the webs [mm];
u3 is the distance from the rebar centre to lower flange [mm];
z is the factor indicating the position of rebar in the rib [mm].

Figure 2 illustrated how to measure the distances u1 , u2 and u3 for the reinforcement bars in the ribs of a composite slab.


Figure 2 Definition of u1 , u2 and u3 for rebar in the rib (EN1994-1-2: 2003)

Concrete Slab over Steel Decking

For the concrete slab over steel decking, prEN1994-1-2 does not provide a simple model for calculating the temperature distribution. It only provides a conservative approximation by treating the composite slabs as solid slabs with the temperature distribution.

In the calculation, the composite slab is replaced by a solid slab with an effective thickness heff which is given by:

(3)
where the cross section dimensions h1 , h2 , l1 , l2 and l3 are given in Figure 3.

Figure 3 Cross section dimensions of composite slabs (EN1994-1-2: 2003)

The temperature at a depth x from heff can then be obtained from Table 3.

Design
  Introduction
  Requirements
  Methodology
  Prescriptive
  Performance
  Educational Packages
Performance
  Fire Modelling
  Thermal Analyses
  Structural Analyses
 
© One Stop Shop in Structural Fire Engineering, Professor Colin Bailey, University of Manchester. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer | Feedback |